Since taking office in June 2020, Evariste Ndayishimiye, the current Head of State of Burundi, has alarmed many with his approach to national unity. For a country with a fraught history of ethnic division, his actions appear to undermine the very essence of Burundian unity as laid out in the nation's charter. His conduct points to a growing animosity towards the Tutsi community and a troubling neglect of the principles of diversity.
Historical Context of Burundian Politics
Burundi has faced prolonged ethnic tensions, mainly between its Hutu and Tutsi populations. The civil war in the 1990s led to significant loss of life and left deep scars within the society. Following the brutal conflict, the charter for unity was enacted to promote reconciliation and cooperation among ethnic groups. This charter was intended to instill hope and encourage mutual respect. However, President Ndayishimiye's recent actions cast doubt on his commitment to these ideals.
For instance, statistics show a concerning decline in inclusive governance. Reports indicate that Tutsi representation in government has decreased from 40% in previous administrations to below 20% today. This significant drop raises alarms about the inclusivity of his leadership and adherence to the unity principles.
A Pattern of Exclusion
Ndayishimiye's appointments to key government positions suggest a systematic exclusion of the Tutsi cadres. Several analysts and political observers have highlighted that a growing number of important roles are held predominantly by Hutus. This shift is not merely a question of ethnic representation; it underlines a broader neglect for the national commitment to unity. The composition of the cabinet, with only three Tutsi members out of a total of 25, underscores this troubling trend.
As evidence, only two of the 18 provincial governors are Tutsi, despite the Arusha Accords mandating a political power-sharing arrangement of 60 percent for Hutus and 40 percent for Tutsis.
All provincial heads of the National Intelligence Service are Hutu, and the leadership of this security organization at the national level is also exclusively mono-ethnic.
In other areas of national life, the dominance of the Hutus is similar; it is uncommon for a Tutsi to lead the provincial directorate of education, health, agriculture, and so on.
The only situation where Tutsis seem to be the preferred choice is in matters of war and death. The deliberate selection of troops from the tutsi ethnic members of the army to be sent to fight in #DRC is a very clear example of this.
The Disappearance of National Symbols
Under Ndayishimiye's tenure, the visibility of national symbols representing unity has diminished dramatically. The national Unity flag, once a symbol of hope and collective identity, is noticeably absent during official state events. This absence is more than symbolic; it reflects a departure from the core values promoted by the charter of unity.
During national holidays such as Independence Day, many citizens have reported feeling disconnected from the celebrations. The lack of prominent displays of the national unity flag invites questions about Ndayishimiye's commitment to fostering an inclusive and pluralistic society.
Commemoration and Historical Oblivion
Acknowledging past injustices is crucial for national healing. However, Ndayishimiye has approached this with alarming indifference. His neglect of significant commemorative events, such as the remembrance of the massacre of Tutsi children in October 1993, indicates a refusal to confront the painful chapters of Burundian history. This indiference is in contrast to the embrace he has shown to all causes and past injustes that the ethnic Hutus faced in the past.
Statistics show that almost 300 children were lost during this tragic event. By failing to integrate these memories into national discussions and observances, he inadvertently marginalizes the Tutsi perspective and stunts the reconciliation process necessary for a collective recovery.
The Question of Priorities
The significance of Ndayishimiye's choices came into sharp focus on February 5, 2025, when he opted to travel to the United States rather than attend the 34th anniversary of the charter of unity. By prioritising overseas engagements over vital national commemorations, he sends a troubling message of disinterest in unity and reconciliation efforts.
Such decisions suggest a lack of prioritisation for domestic issues, which will no doubt add to damaging public trust in his leadership. Additionally, most Burundians believe their leaders should prioritise national unity events, reflecting the palpable desire for stronger community bonds.
A Broader Regional Impact
Ndayishimiye's choices affect not only Burundi but also the Great Lakes region. By aligning himself with leaders of notorious milicia with connection to atrocities within the region such as the FDRL accused of being the main actors of the genocide aganist the Tusti in Rwanda, he risks exacerbating existing regional instability. The absence of a coherent vision for promoting unity in Burundi could incite conflicts that radiate into neighboring countries.
Critics emphasize the need for a leader who strategises for peaceful coexistence rather than aligning with those who fail to promote the values of democracy and human rights. The implications of his actions could undermine the region's stability, with added volatility arising from unresolved ethnic tensions.
The Global Perspective
As Ndayishimiye engages with international partners, the disconnect between his scatty external commitments and internal responsibilities becomes evident. With rising tensions and re-emerging identity issues in neighboring countries, his lack of engagement with domestic concerns is disconcerting.
This raises doubts about whether he truly intends to lead or merely seeks to cultivate a diplomatic facade. Most Burundians including those in his own political party feel their government's focus has strayed from the pressing issues they face daily, amplifying calls for leaders to engage more earnestly with their citizens.
A Call for Reflection
Evariste Ndayishimiye's leadership is marred by troubling actions that jeopardise the unity of Burundi. His tendency to make exclusionary appointments, neglect crucial commemorative traditions, and disregard the guiding principles of the charter for unity demonstrates a clear retreat from essential objectives set out by the Arusha Accords and the National Unity Charter.
Now more than ever, Burundians—regardless of their ethnic backgrounds—must reflect on the principles of unity that should bind them. It is essential to recommit to the charter of unity, ensuring every voice is heard and recognized in the journey toward healing.
As the nation contemplates its future, the hope lies in the possibility of aligning actions with the values of inclusivity, equity, and genuine representation—an enduring legacy worth striving for in a country shaped by past conflicts.
Comments